Last Updated on January 16, 2019 by Luke Arkins

Baseball, like no other sport, relies upon statistics to recognize greatness. Even the casual fan recognizes the significance of milestones such as 3,000 hits, 500 and 600 home runs, and 300 pitching wins. Reaching these heights of statistical superiority places a player in exclusive company.

Fans aren’t the only users of these time-tested milestones. Nearly every baseball writer refers to statistics when discussing the players who merit inclusion into baseball’s Hall of Fame.

It doesn’t matter whether fans view Hank Aaron or Barry Bonds as the game’s all-time home run leader. The fact that that can easily identify one of these great players as the home run king demonstrates the love affair baseball fans and pundits have with records. In recent years, a new method of measuring performance has crept into the collective consciousness of baseball fans — sabermetrics.

As a Prospect Insider reader, you’re already familiar with these advanced metrics, which take an innovative approach to gauging performance — and value — on the diamond. A mainstream fan is most likely to hear about this new-age methodology during baseball broadcasts when on-air personalities note how sabermetrics have influenced defensive shifts, which are a by-product of clubs analyzing the specific tendencies of individual hitters.

Whether it’s the designated hitter, instant replay, or wild card berths, the introduction of something new into baseball is certain to lead to controversy and grumbling from the old guard. The same applies to sabermetrics. Not long ago, I noted the disdain that Hall of Fame reliever Goose Gossage directed at the new generation of executives who he derisively referred to as “nerds.”

Gossage feels that the new wave of front office personnel are ruining the game. He’s not a solitary voice in the proverbial wilderness when it comes to disparaging these “nerdy” stats. Plenty of fans and pundits — mostly of the older variety — prefer to stick with time-tested statistics such as batting average and runs batted in.

Not every “old guy” loathes the new-age stuff. I’m a Baby Boomer who happens to be well versed in historic milestones and, yet, comfortable with using advanced metrics in my Prospect Insider contributions. I guess that makes me some sort of a hybrid capable of blending old and new ideas together.

With that said, I’m not a “saber-drone.” When doing research, I tend to gravitate towards straightforward stats that help quickly quantify a player’s performance level or value. The last thing I’m looking for is a math lesson and I certainly don’t want to give one to the reader. Just give me something that makes it easier for me to convey my point to a reader. That brings me to wins above replacement.

Wins Above Replacement (WAR) is an attempt by the sabermetric baseball community to summarize a player’s total contributions to their team in one statistic. — FanGraphs

Note: For those of you who want to know more about my favorite saber-stat, you can find a superb explanation from FanGraphs here.

Some fans and pundits embrace the use of WAR, while others detest the thought of using such a radical measure. Longtime Boston Globe columnist Bob Ryan made it clear that he’s frustrated with the influence that WAR is having on baseball writers and “seamheads” when he declared, “WAR is nonsense.”

To be fair, Ryan isn’t a saber-hater. He believes sabermetric pioneer Bill James “led a true revolution in baseball thinking and has performed a valuable service.” However, the veteran writer laments that the revolution started by James has been “commandeered by zealots.”

Although I don’t fall into the “zealot” category, I do consider WAR my “go to” stat when initially reviewing and comparing position players. It lets me compare players who played different positions or in a different era. I guess you could call me a WAR-monger.

For me, WAR serves as a starting point, but not a stand alone statistic. To see how it can serve as a starting point of an analytical journey, let’s take a look at the five position players who had the highest WAR during the 2015 season.

Rk Player WAR Year Age Tm G PA H 2B 3B HR SB BA OBP SLG OPS
1 Bryce Harper 9.9 2015 22 WSN 153 654 172 38 1 42 6 .330 .460 .649 1.109
2 Mike Trout 9.4 2015 23 LAA 159 682 172 32 6 41 11 .299 .402 .590 .991
3 Josh Donaldson 8.8 2015 29 TOR 158 711 184 41 2 41 6 .297 .371 .568 .939
4 Paul Goldschmidt 8.8 2015 27 ARI 159 695 182 38 2 33 21 .321 .435 .570 1.005
5 Joey Votto 7.6 2015 31 CIN 158 695 171 33 2 29 11 .314 .459 .541 1.000
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/5/2016.

I think that most fans would agree that these individuals deserve consideration for a top-five player ranking. Sure, some will bicker over the order or suggest several other worthy names. There’s no denying that WAR provided a good yardstick, but further analysis is required.

The next five players prove that point. A couple of names listed below provide ammunition for anti-WAR activists who dispel the use of WAR as utter “nonsense.”

Rk Player WAR Year Age Tm G PA H 2B 3B HR SB BA OBP SLG OPS
6 A.J. Pollock 7.4 2015 27 ARI 157 673 192 39 6 20 39 .315 .367 .498 .865
7 Kevin Kiermaier 7.3 2015 25 TBR 151 535 133 25 12 10 18 .263 .298 .420 .718
8 Lorenzo Cain 7.2 2015 29 KCR 140 604 169 34 6 16 28 .307 .361 .477 .838
9 Manny Machado 7.1 2015 22 BAL 162 713 181 30 1 35 20 .286 .359 .502 .861
10 Jason Heyward 6.5 2015 25 STL 154 610 160 33 4 13 23 .293 .359 .439 .797
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/5/2016.

Kevin Kiermaier of the Tampa Bay Rays is a great player, but he wouldn’t make the top-10 list of many baseball fans or observers outside of the Tampa/St. Petersburg area. That doesn’t mean that he isn’t a dynamic and valuable player. But, he’s not a top-10 player.

The “problem” with Kiermaier is that the majority of his WAR value is rooted in his superb defensive prowess, while his on-base percentage and on-base plus slugging percentage were both league-average in 2015.

Although most fans would love to have Kiermaier patrolling center field, I believe that most would prefer Lorenzo Cain, Andrew McCutchen, or Mike Trout to Tampa Bay’s star.  Kiermaier may “out-glove” the trio. But, all three are — at the very least — decent fielders and provide more offensive upside than the 2015 Gold Glove winner.

The other player who’s likely to receive scrutiny from the casual fan and WAR opponents is Jason Heyward, who signed an eight-year/$184 million deal with the Chicago Cubs during the offseason.

Observers who rely upon conventional statistics generally believe that Heyward is a solid player, but his good — not great — performance didn’t merit the fourteenth highest contract in the history of baseball. Although I’m a WAR proponent, I tend to agree.

In my mind, Heyward is much like Bernie Williams. An excellent player who makes a good team better. Every fan wants players like them on their team’s roster. However, they’re not the kind of player who can carry a team. They’re elite-level complementary players if there’s such a thing.

Both Kiermaier and Heyward catapulted into the top-10 thanks to their value as a defender. When ranked based solely on offensive WAR (oWAR), the top-five had the same names. But, the next five had a much different look to it.

Rk Player oWAR Year Age Tm G PA H 2B 3B HR SB BA OBP SLG OPS
6 Nelson Cruz 6.0 2015 34 SEA 152 655 178 22 1 44 3 .302 .369 .566 .936
7 A.J. Pollock 5.9 2015 27 ARI 157 673 192 39 6 20 39 .315 .367 .498 .865
8 Andrew McCutchen 5.8 2015 28 PIT 157 685 165 36 3 23 11 .292 .401 .488 .889
9 Manny Machado 5.7 2015 22 BAL 162 713 181 30 1 35 20 .286 .359 .502 .861
10 Kris Bryant 5.5 2015 23 CHC 151 650 154 31 5 26 13 .275 .369 .488 .858
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/5/2016.

Gone are Kiermaier, Heyward, and Cain, while Nelson Cruz, Andrew McCutchen, and Kris Bryant take their place. I suspect that the new players combined with the holdovers from the previous lists would form a better-received top-10 list in the eyes of most.

As I said earlier, WAR lets us compare players from different eras, which helps put today’s performances into context and helps fuel another passion of baseball fans — the annual Hall of Fame arguments.

With that in mind, let’s take a quick look at the 10 players with the highest career WAR ever. All are historical figures and I doubt that the outcome will come as a surprise to most baseball fans.

Rk Player WAR From To Age G PA H 2B 3B HR SB BA OBP SLG OPS
1 Babe Ruth 163.1 1914 1935 19-40 2504 10622 2873 506 136 714 123 .342 .474 .690 1.164
2 Barry Bonds 162.4 1986 2007 21-42 2986 12606 2935 601 77 762 514 .298 .444 .607 1.051
3 Willie Mays 156.2 1951 1973 20-42 2992 12496 3283 523 140 660 338 .302 .384 .557 .941
4 Ty Cobb 151.0 1905 1928 18-41 3034 13087 4189 724 295 117 897 .366 .433 .512 .945
5 Hank Aaron 142.6 1954 1976 20-42 3298 13941 3771 624 98 755 240 .305 .374 .555 .928
6 Tris Speaker 133.7 1907 1928 19-40 2792 11995 3514 792 222 117 436 .345 .428 .500 .928
7 Honus Wagner 131.0 1897 1917 23-43 2795 11749 3420 643 252 101 723 .328 .391 .467 .858
8 Stan Musial 128.1 1941 1963 20-42 3026 12718 3630 725 177 475 78 .331 .417 .559 .976
9 Rogers Hornsby 127.0 1915 1937 19-41 2259 9480 2930 541 169 301 135 .358 .434 .577 1.010
10 Eddie Collins 123.9 1906 1930 19-43 2825 12046 3315 438 187 47 741 .333 .424 .429 .853
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/5/2016.

Babe Ruth is viewed by most as the greatest baseball player in the history of the sport. Therefore, it’s no surprise to find him at the top of the list. I suspect that most baseball observers would agree that Willie Mays, Ty Cobb, and Hank Aaron belong in the top-five conversation.

Some may not view Barry Bonds as an all-time great due to allegations of performance enhancing drug use and that’s fine. I’m not trying to defend anyone’s credentials. But, there’s no denying that the statistics that Bonds amassed during his 22-year career — including his WAR — place him among the top performers in the game, ever.

Some fans may notice that a couple of notable names — Ted Williams and Lou Gehrig — didn’t make the top-10 WAR list. There’s a simple explanation in both instances that proves why you can’t rely on WAR alone to solve problems.

Rk Player WAR From To Age G PA H 2B 3B HR SB BA OBP SLG OPS
11 Ted Williams 123.1 1939 1960 20-41 2292 9788 2654 525 71 521 24 .344 .482 .634 1.116
13 Lou Gehrig 112.4 1923 1939 20-36 2164 9663 2721 534 163 493 102 .340 .447 .632 1.080
Provided by View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 4/5/2016.

Williams — the last player to hit .400 or higher in a season — lost considerable playing time to the real and devastating kind of war. The “Splendid Splinter” didn’t play for three full seasons between 1943-45 due to military service during World War II. He also lost most of two seasons to the Korean War when he only played in a combined 43 games during 1952-53.

Let’s put that lost playing time into perspective. Williams’ first tour of military duty occurred between the ages of 24 and 26. Imagine the impact on the baseball careers of Mike Trout or Bryce Harper if they missed the next three seasons when they’d be approximately the same age as Williams during his World War II involvement.

Considering that Williams’ combined WAR was 21.5 during the seasons prior to and after his return from World War II, it’s realistic to assume that he’d have registered another 25-30 WAR if he had never left. Add value lost due to the Korean War and you’re looking at one of the top-three players of all-time. Perhaps, the best.

Sadly, Gehrig’s career and life were shortened by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as “Lou Gehrig’s disease.” Unlike Williams, Gehrig’s lost playing time came at the end of his career.

Known as the “Iron Horse” for playing in a record-setting 2,130 consecutive games, his WAR dropped from 7.7 in 1937 to 4.3 the following season. Under normal circumstances, that decline would be chalked up to Father Time since Gehrig was 35-years-old at the time.

In retrospect, the underlying cause of Gehrig’s withering value was ALS. Assuming his performance regression followed a more conventional path; it’s reasonable to expect that he would’ve played three or four more years and cracked the top-10 list.

So, what does all of this prove? For a WAR-monger like me, it proves that WAR is a great metric to gauge a player’s value to his team and his standing among peers and even all-time greats.

With that said, relying solely on WAR is inadvisable. As we saw with Ted Williams, Gehrig, Kiermaier, and Heyward, you have to look deeper in order to get the “rest of the story” on players. But, WAR is a good starting point.

In the end, isn’t every baseball statistic nothing more than a conversation starter? Debating which player was the best of all time is a time-honored tradition for baseball fans. WAR just adds another layer to the fray. All that I’m saying to Goose Gossage, Bob Ryan, and other naysayers is don’t take WAR off the table as an option. Just give WAR a chance.



Follow Luke!
Latest posts by Luke Arkins (see all)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.