| By Jason A. Churchill | ![]() | By 03-02-2011 |
Each week here at Prospect Insider we will take a look around the 2011 draft class, which could prove to be one of the better classes of all time before the spring is over. We'll occasionally focus on one or two players, or a specific region, skill or position. Included in that will be full scouting reports and analysis of the possibilities for the Seattle Mariners at No. 2, and a focus on the Northwest Area, which boasts several potential first-day selections. To read our full 2011 Draft Preview which includes an Area Top 10, click here.| 1. By: sexymarinersfan on 03-02-2011 03:49:46 I imagine Jack would be interested in a guy like Lindor. He told me at Fanfest that they M's did have their eye on one INF player amongst 4 others, one being and OF, and the other 3 pitchers. So maybe Lindor is on their radar. |
| 2. By: acqb1424 on 03-02-2011 08:28:17 Could be, but I'm assuming Jack was referring to Anthony Rendon. |
| 3. By: Jason A. Churchill on 03-02-2011 11:34:40 Lindor is certainly on their radar, that's without question. But there is also no question that today, they want Rendon first and foremost. |
| 4. By: itchyrow on 03-02-2011 12:04:20 Thanks for the info on the local HS kids. Good to see them getting recognition here. But, you're mistaken on Snell's height. He's more like 6'3" or 6'4" than 6'1", which probably gives him substantially more projectability. |
| 5. By: Jason A. Churchill on 03-02-2011 12:54:34 Actually, I just forgot to change the height, but he lacks projection because of his delivery and sleight build combination. He does have more upside than Davis, however. His velocity this spring will be key. |
| 6. By: maqman on 03-02-2011 13:19:35 Lindor looks attractive but we have a couple of pretty good SS prospects. I'm wondering if the OF Z had in mind is Springer? |
| 7. By: Lailoken on 03-02-2011 15:45:42 Jason, How close is Kittredge to cracking the top ten? |
| 8. By: Jason A. Churchill on 03-02-2011 18:04:19 Not very close. he will get drafted, however. |
| 9. By: sexymarinersfan on 03-03-2011 00:00:41 I immediately thought of Springer when he said that. But it could've been Starling as well. I kind of like the fact that Springer doesn't have Scott Boras for an agent. It would seem to be a much easier signing, more than likely anyways. |
| 10. By: sexymarinersfan on 03-03-2011 01:05:08 We traded Manny Lawson to Cleveland for LHP Aaron Laffey today btw! |
| 11. By: Shawnuel on 03-03-2011 11:22:15 Having an abundance of good SS prospects is never a problem. They are usually the best and most instinctive athletes on the field and can often be moved to another position pretty easily. Adam Jones to CF for example. |
| 12. By: Edman on 03-03-2011 14:19:08 #10, it's actually Matt Lawson, not that it matters. Shortstops are always valuable, but regardless of that, it's about finding major league quality talent, at whatever position they play. If they think you can hit major league pitching, they'll find a place for you, especially in the AL, with a DH position to fall back on, even if you have stone hands in the field. |
| 13. By: Adam B. on 03-03-2011 15:13:18 It's sounding more and more like it'd be a real stretch to see the M's draft anything but Rendon or a pitcher at #2, but the M's do actually have a need at SS since none of their current crop (Triunfel, Littlewood, Peguero and even Franklin) project well at the position long-term. I'd really hope the M's would focus some of their later picks on shoring up organizational depth at Short and Catcher as the pickings are very slim in the system as is. As for Laffey, basically the M's just added another name to "the heap" while also clearing up some of the infield log-jam between Jackson and Tacoma. Lawson's ceiling was as a utility player and the M's already have those in spades ala Seager, Tennbrink, Mangini and Tuiasosopo so this trade gets a giant "Eh." from me. |
![]() |
| Copyright 2010 Prospect Insider | Created by AQ Central Prospect Insider is optimized for Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome |