
The Mariners were a good baseball team in 2000. Maybe better than good. They weren’t great, but they scored 907 runs, fourth in the league, and made the postseason for the third time in club history.
In 2001, they made history, scoring 927 runs on their way to 116 victories.
They won 93 games in 2002 and another 93 in 2003. The M’s were 6th in AL in runs in ‘02 and 7th in ‘03.
Scoring 795 and 814 runs isn’t a juggernaut of an offense, but it’s efficient and when built around a solid pitching staff and strong defense, a lot of wins are headed your way.
The Mariners had the recipe for success right in their pocket protectors, and what did they do? They tossed it out with the next day’s trash.
The Mariners finished in the top half of the league in runs scored during all four of the seasons mentioned above and not-so-coincidentally finished in the top five in OBP each season, finish second twice and leading the league once.
Since then the club has finished 10th, 14th, 13th and 7th.
In runs scored in the four 93+ win seasons the club finished 4th, 1st, 6th and 7th.
Since then they have finished 14th, 13th, 13th and 7th, in that order.
Coincidence?
No, not a chance. Want proof?
During the last four seasons, 2004-2007, the leaders in runs scored include the Yankees, Red Sox, Tigers, Indians, Angels, White Sox and Rangers.
Not only have those clubs won a lot of games - all but the Rangers have made the postseason during that span - but they also show up one the leaderboards in OBP during those years as well. Every single one of them.
For all the glory and entertainment of the long ball, getting on base at high levels is the key to scoring runs.
While the Mariners have been after power, and even failing at that, they should have been after hitters that can get on base.
This isn’t a new concept, nobody is having an epiphany here as this has been pounded into the brains of readers throughout the M’s blogosphere for years, but how could the Mariners be this, um, ridiculously unsmart?
Sports leagues are copy cat leagues. In the NFL, a team sees the 80s and early 90s 49ers win five Super Bowls with the west coast offense and finesse running game and now 20 teams are using a variation of that very offensive scheme.
The 80s Detroit Pistons’ defensive prowess showed the Chicago Bulls how they were going to win six titles in eight years, and subsequently how the Lakers were going to win with and without Shaquille O’Neal.
In Major League Baseball, the smart and savvy are building from within, hording young pitching and inexpensive all-around contributors and stacking their lineups with high-OBP bats, a balanced diet of left-handed hitters and good defense at key positions, particularly when the offense at that position isn’t there.
The Red Sox won the Series in ‘04 largely due to their mid-season move that landed them a downgrade offensively at shortstop, but a major upgrade in the field in Orlando Cabrera.
Boston is also a good example of when to pay the premium for pitching.
The Sox put a rangy outfielder in center (Coco Crisp), continued to go for defense at short and second, often sacrificing offense (see: Alex Cora, Alex Gonzalez) and trusted their better position prospects (Youkilis, Pedroia) to supplement their high-OBP lineup and THEN went out and traded Hanley Ramirez and Anibal Sanchez for Josh Beckett.
And they didn’t stop there. In order to make sure it wasn’t a wasted sacrifice of two extremely promising young players and two other minor leaguers, Boston prepared their top pitching prospect to again pitch in relief in case their oft-injured closer Keith Foulke turned up lame again.
The Red Sox were fully prepared to make a run at a World Series title when the 2006 season began, and though they did not succeed, their club was built for a multi-year window of opportunity.
The Mariners, on the other hand, sacrificed Adam Jones, Chris Tillman, Tony Butler, Kameron Mickolio and George Sherrill, two of whom were current major league talents, for a two-year window with left-hander Erik Bedard.
Furthermore, the club backed up that move by failing to upgrade any other area of the roster, which is why we are all sitting here today and wondering if the Bedard acquisition is already a major bust, at no fault of his own.
The Mariners put together that 2000-2001 team with one thing in mind, winning, and GM Pat Gillick, for all of his long-term faults, covered the bases.
The bullpen got a major overhaul, the rotation was stacked with innings eaters and the lineup was laced with high-OBP, low-to-medium power bats and a few low-risk bats with upside.
What the 2008 Seattle Mariners did was buy one Michelin Pilot Sport tire designed for a ZR-1 Corvette and put it on a Mack truck headed for nowhere without an engine while missing the 17 other wheels needed to go places.
The Mariners need a new engine, and a new mechanic in which to build that engine. But they also require a new mindset from the ownership, the CEO and the president.
A mindset that fails, by choice, at one thing and one thing only: ignoring what made them a successful baseball team in the first place.
All the Mariners have to do is copy themselves. How difficult can that really be?
Send Kudos to Prospect Insider for this Report!

Seems every year there are a similar number of answers and questions. There are things that are somewhat known facts about the Seattle Mariners and their season ahead, and things that remain a mystery.
6. Can John McLaren use his bench more effectively in order to keep the regulars, particularly catcher Kenji Johjima, fresh, healthy and primed for the stretch drive?