Let’s keep this short and as bitter as the Seattle Mariners are obtuse.
with the 20th pick in the first round of the 2008 First-Year Players Draft, your Seattle Mariners select…
The worst pick in the entire first round.
No, not because University of Georgia closer Josh Fields isn’t a really good pitcher, it’s because he’s a reliever and the club has no chance to compete in 2008.
Once again, the M’s make very clear that they have no plan, no vision, no direction and no clue how to truly build a successful Major League Baseball team.
And if at first you don’t succeed, do it again in round two, says the Mariners.
Dennis Raben is an anti-athletic outfielder who projects defensively at first base, but probably doesn’t have the bat to play there regularly.
The knock on him, aside from a lengthy swing, late load and restricting trigger, Raben often finds himself in pitcher’s counts, perhaps due to being too patient. He doesn’t square up balls with consistency and struggles to hit line drives regularly, even in batting practice.
He’s basically Matt Mangini all over again.
The Mariners did better in rounds three-through-six, starting with Ben Pribanic, a 6-4, 200-pound righty with an above-average fastball and the makings of an above-average slider.
In round four, Seattle stayed on the college pitcher trail, taking Elon, North Carolina product Steve Hensley who sits low-90s with his fastball and uses a curve, slider and change. His slider is said to be ahead of his low-70s curve ball.
Perhaps the best value in their draft came in round five when the M’s took Brett Lorin, a right-handed starter from Long Beach State. Lorin is 6-7 and 250 pounds and could follow the career path of since-trade righty Kameron Mickolio, though the Mariners are expected to let Lorin start his career in the rotation.
Sixth rounder Jarrett Burgess is an interest athlete, but you know how that goes sometimes.
Round 1, No. 20 overall - Joshua Fields, RHP - Georgia - D
The sole reason it’s not an F is that Fields is actually a top 25 talent. It just made no sense for a team destined to lose 100 games this season would desire a reliever that high when much of his value is wrapped in the lack of risk in probability and timetable.
Round 2, No. 66 overall - Dennis Raben, 1B - Miami - D
The M’s are clearly trying to find lightning in a bottle with a left-handed corner bat, but Raben invoked this out of a scout that saw him at the ACC tournament: “Not nearly as much to like as I expected. His swing doesn’t bother me too much - (there are) things we can do to fix that - but he didn’t show any intelligence up there, no game plan. It seemed he wasn’t really thinking about the pitcher he was facing or looking at his current count. His physical tools are fine, but he’s not a high schooler with time to develop. We left early on day two to get some food, if that tells you anything.”
Round 3, Benjamin Pribanic, RHP - Nebraska - C+
Not a bad selection, especially this far down in the draft when it’s sometimes barely more than a guessing game with college talent. Most scouts think he’s a No. 4-5 starter or a 7th-inning relief arm.
The best move for the M’s for the second straight round would have been to take prep righty Tim Melville and pay him. Kansas City, a small market club, is planning just that.
Round 4, Steve Hensley, RHP - Elon - C-
At this stage, Seattle could have gone in several directions but are clearly drafting for organizational need. Without a lot of experienced arms in High-A and Double-A ball that project as starters, despite doing the same “draft a bunch of college pitchers” thing three straight years, they continue the trend, I guess hoping to get lucky once.
These types of arms do serve a valuable purpose however. When there is no need to rush such pitchers as Phillippe Aumont, Juan Ramirez, Michael Pineda, etc, you have to fill out a roster with someone.
This way, you can avoid pitching someone in a bad environment, such as High Desert, at all or for too long because there are other competitive pitchers to place at that level.
Round 5, Brett Lorin, RHP - Long Beach State - C-
Really, guys? Really? How many college pitchers do you need to draft before you realize you actually suck at getting value out of them.
The prep pitchers (Aumont, Tillman, Butler, Adcock) seem to be destroying your belief system that college arms are a good idea, especially after round one.
It’s much easier to find a hidden gem from the prep ranks.
Round 6, Jarrett Burgess, OF - Florida Christian HS (Miami, Fla.) - D -
The Mariners scout even said he was a day two guy at best, though he had intriguing physical skills. WTFSMs?
Overall Grade: D+
Passing on Melville and his money demands is one thing, but letting left-hander Christian Friedrich go by, too?
Inexcusable.
A southpaw with three major league average pitches and - a fourth on the way - and above-average command? My goodness, that sounds like a tailor-made slot in the rotation behind Erik Bedard and Felix Hernandez, and probably ready by July, 2009 when you’d like to boot out another of your veteran starters.
Drafting Morrow is one thing, because there is the chance he can start effectively. Drafting Fields, who has two pitches and no semblance of a third, durability concerns - even in relief - and n ultimate role as a setup man or closer, is insane.
As an organization, the Mariners get an F, and that doesn’t only stand for the worst grade in the book.


 
 
I’m sure they’re not smart enough. But any chance that Fields leads the Mariners to stretch out Morrow to become a starter? Oh wait no…that would make sense. I hate this organization so much.
The M’s are still reeling from trading Soriano.
The M’s have one of the worst pitching staffs in MLB, and is one of the worst offensive teams in MLB…and they select a reliever?
Only this organization. What pisses me off is the reasoning behind it most likely has to do with them wanting to make Morrow a starter, something they don’t know for sure will work out.
Instead of drafting a reliever and moving Morrow to the rotation, I’d almost them rather draft Friedrich and keep Morrow in the bullpen.
Ultimately I don’t see why they couldn’t put Friedrich AND Morrow in the rotation.
How much blame does Fontaine get? This is a poor effort from him, but were his hands tied?
PS - I hate this team more than any of you…
No that’s just down right depressing. I wish I wasn’t emotionally addicted to this team. I am so over this franchise, I just wish I could quit.
Hopefully we finish with the worst record in the majors and draft Stratsburg. Just watched the video of a 23 strikeout game, downright nasty. Only then would this pick work out.
Some like the third rounder more than me. Some like the 5th rounder more than me.
They took projects, which is clearly something they aren’t good at finishing.
Horrible draft, one of the worst in baseball this year. Bottom three at best.
Even Fabian Williamson outpitched most college picks from last year.
Well, he did so in the rookie league, so I don’t want to put much weight into the numbers…
This draft reminds me of when Chuck Knox was the coach of the Seahawks and wanted to take some guy named Brett Favre. Owner Ken Behring over rode him and the Seahawks pick QB Dan McGuire.
The pick Fields has the Mariners not drafting for the longterm health of the franchise, but for the short term dictated by Bavasi. He is desperate, which makes me doubly afraid, as he does not make good trades when there is little pressure. What will happen when he is as desperate as he is now?
Bavasi took over a team with a weak farm system, but the major league team had a lot of success. By the time management gets a clue, I’m afraid that we will again have a weak farm system, but without the success on the big league level.
We can still hope for Michael Iona, I think he would make up for this depressing draft. The international game is probably the only part of the organization that we excel at, at least we have that going for us. Anyone to look for on the summer league rosters? Efrain Nunez is a switch hitting 17 year old who is doing alright, I know it is a small sample size but I am trying to be an optimist here.
I still think Raben has a chance to be pretty good. Ba Ranked him as the 34th best player, ahead of first rounders Lawrie and Dykstra.
Neither Lawrie nor Dykstra are legit first rounders, though, and BA didn’t update their rankings because everyone I talked to said Raben took a major step back over the past month, particularly during the ACC tournament.
There’s a chance he’s a big league regular, but I’d put that at 10%.
USSMariner’s “Scout Friend” quote about Raben:
Second Round: Dennis Raben, OF, Miami
I’ll just quote Scout Friend on this one: “Fifteen years ago, Ben Grieve was the #2 pick in the draft with this exact same package. Grieve had a shorter stroke and more bat speed, but Raben’s pretty much a Grieve clone. That kid got a lot of crap for not living up to the hype, but he had a pretty decent career, and where you guys took him, that’s a good value.”
Best Case Scenario: Brian Giles
More Likely Outcome: Ben Grieve
What do you think about that Jason? Out of left field? Or possible? Grieve had some good seasons..
OT, but Nunez is putting up nice numbers in the DSL. Wasn’t he one of the big money international FA’s? He looks like someone to keep and eye on.
Grieve was just vastly overdrafted by a then-dumb scouting department.
Plus, the situations and draft-time skills aren’t comparable for developmental purposes because Grieve was an 18-year-old prep kid and Raben has three years on him. THE most important three years of a player’s development.
Re: Nunez
He’s played three games. I wouldn’t exactly call that anything but a microscopic sample size.
But he’s a switch hitter with power from both sides of the plate and a rare Latin kid who will take a walk at a young age.
16, I know it’s early for him, I’m just looking for a reason to be optimistic about somthing in this orginization
Thanks for the response Jason.
How does Raben compare to our college bats from 2007’s draft - Dunigan, McOwen, and Mangini?
Also - PI’s quote from our FO - “The thing kind of unfolded like we saw it,” Fontaine said. “We’re pretty happy it worked out this way.” YIKES!
looks like bavasi’s heavy hand was too involved in this draft.
bozo bill says:
#1 give me someone to replace morrow as the 8 guy.
#2 give me the best talent u find for 1st base.
#3 now get the 3 best college starters u can so they can get here fast to save my ass from the chopping block.
obviously i’m guessing,but i’d say fontaine’s hands were tied.
it’s not bad enough bavasi’s screwing up the big league team,now he’s screwing up the minors.
it’s called DESPERATION!(a state of hopelessness leading to rashness)
Sorry, but if the kid was the best player available on their draft board, then they did the right thing. Jason, that you of all people, know you don’t let organizational needs dictate your first round choice.
None of will ever know if there were kids rated higher on their draft board, so it’s futile to hazzard guesses we can’t substantiate.
In five years, we’ll all know if it was a good pick, or a bad one. One thing for sure, it’s just plain silly to think they were drafting for this season. Believe it or not, they can do the same math some of you accuse them of being unable to do.
That’s the problem right there, Ed, Fields should not have been their best player, and I’m pretty sure he wasn’t the best talent on the board.
They drafted for need, and signability, again.
And Ed, you’re alone here.
Realize that before you go off, eh?
And you shouldn’t consider signability with your first round pick? What good is a pick you can’t sign?
And no, I’m not alone. Minority, yes.
I never get too concerned, especially after the tenth pick in the draft, because it’s a crapshoot. There is usually a point in the draft, and it may have been as high as after the second pick, where the talent level drops off dramatically.
When you’re picking 20, you’re gonna get a guy with questions, unless it’s an unbelievably deep draft. So, to say that this was a horrible pick, I just don’t buy it. They all have risks.
And, I’m really unsure exactly what organizational NEED the M’s had, to pick a reliever. I would love for someone to explain that one. To get Morrow into a starting role? Come one, Lowe is starting to come around, so if you already aren’t going anywhere, you could move Morrow NOW if you wanted to.
Here’s the biggest problem with drafting a reliever at #1: Relievers aren’t worth very much, even when they’re ace relievers.
I’d rather have a slightly above average ML first baseman or a #3-4 rotation starter than an ace reliever. They just aren’t that important of a factor in winning games.
And if you’re going on need… Relief pitching is among the deepest parts of the Ms orginization.
I wonder if drafting Fields is meant to clear the way for trading J.J. With two more cheap year on his contract ,J.J.’s the best trading piece the M’s have right now. They could probably get some serious competition for him from teams like Boston, Tampa, Cleveland, and Detroit.
If they are going to blow this thing up this year, trading JJ will be a little easier to explain to the fans if you can point to Fields as his heir apparent.
This pick is really sad. It really reinforces AGAIN that management really does not know how to build a winning team.
I honestly believe that Fields will be a major league pitcher and has a chance to be a decent to good reliever. But, like many have written, this is not good value for the 20th pick.
This pick is like an NFL team taking a kicker in the first round. The guy is just about guaranteed to make the roster and be an NFL kicker. He is likely to be a decent to good kicker. But, no matter how good you think the kicker will turn out, it just isn’t good value to take a kicker that high. In other words, you should never have a kicker rated that high on your draft board.
The Mariners should never have had a reliever rated that high on their draft board.
>And you shouldn’t consider signability with your first round pick? What good is a pick you can’t sign?
Actually, Ed, with the new rules, if you don’t sign your first round pick, you get another one in that slot next year. So, wouldn’t really kill us if we didn’t sign our first rounder.
I’m desperately trying to put a positive spin on this: Any chance that drafting Fields was a political move aimed at placating Boras, thus improving chances at signing one of his clients as a FA OR retaining Beltre?
Prospect Insider - » Grading the Draft: Day One…
More praise for the Mariners front office…
Some could say this is meant to deal Putz. And even I can see that happening. After all, everyone else has been getting a king’s ransom for their cheap arms.
But according to quotes by Bavasi, giving up on 2008 isn’t happening for a while.
And besides, this front office has an awful record of trading. Everyone else could get a king’s ransom. Do you think we would?
Also who’s to say Fields will even move quickly enough? He has to sign, prove his command is major league ready, and then show that he’s capable of focusing it in the majors. And he’d have to do all of that by the end of next month.
Oh, and he’s not even done playing college ball yet.
So wacka wacka!
Here’s hoping to a good Felix day after the debacle of 6/5/08.
Yes its true that bavasi has not “given up on the team yet”, but it will happen. So it really doesnt matter if it happens now or before the trade deadline. Bavasi said it himself, he feels that the players on this team could turn it around, but they will not be given the chance, and that there is NO trade market at this very moment. Closer to the trade deadline, we will be big sellers, and now we can trade putz and put morrow in the minors to stretch out his arm. This pick is not as bad as some make it out to be.
and to the guy that keeps sayin this is like draftin a K in the first round of the NFL, do you even watch sports!? Feilds was the 16th ranked player in the draft. And team ALL the time draft relievers in the first round.
Bob Engle save us!
Jason any updates on how we’re doing signing kids in the Caribbean? I’m trying to forget about this draft, in hopes we have a good year signing guys internationally.
I can’t say I was real happy when I heard the M’s drafted a reliever but if you look at the first round, I think there were some surprise picks just before their own. In some of the mocks I looked at, Cooper and Davis were not scheduled to go in the teens and it wouldn’t have surprised me if the M’s were looking at either of these lefthanded bats. Though a catcher wasn’t needed, the pick of the Astro of taking Castro may have caused a trickle down effect which hurt the M’s. Hard to know for sure.
I had heard mentioned earlier who might have been a better pick and the name of Friedrich came up. But he went at pick 25 which means 4 other teams passed on him after we did. Scouting is so subjective where one teams 20th ranked player is another teams 30th ranked. One scout may think Raben’s swing is long while another one may think some tinkering will fix it. You just never know until a couple years later how a draft really turned out.
Hopefully Engel brings us one/couple of these kids :
RHP Michael Inoa, 6-7 / 200 lbs - 91-94 mph FB, breaking ball, splitter - likely 7-figure bonus
OF Ezdra Abreu - “tall and wiry strong” - possible 7-figure bonus
OF Yorman (or Johermyn) Rodriguez (Venezuela) - “stocky, strong and athletic” - possible 7-figure bonus
OF Orlandito Rodriguez - possible 7-figure bonus
OF Luis Domoromo (Venezuela) - possible 7-figure bonus
The lower end of the first round is totally subjective. It’s like asking you to go into a sixth grade classroom and picking out who you’re gonna hire, when they graduate from High School. Baseball is unlike any other sport, in that talent has to be cultivated and trained, sometimes for five or more years.
So, this idea that there’s a clear cut choice once you get past the first ten or so picks, is incorrect. They’re all guessing and hoping that their scouting pays off.
Personally, I’d rather have an impact player at any position, than filler material. If Friedrich doesn’t have a real shot at being a #2 pitcher in a rotation, then he doesn’t have impact potential. You can buy those kind of guys, you don’t waste a first round draft pick on him. I don’t have the scouting data to know. But, I have seen video of Fields, and he has a NASTY curveball to go with that heat. He’s got impact potential.
If Friedrich doesn’t have a real shot at being a #2 pitcher in a rotation, then he doesn’t have impact potential. You can buy those kind of guys, you don’t waste a first round draft pick on him. I don’t have the scouting data to know. But, I have seen video of Fields, and he has a NASTY curveball to go with that heat. He’s got impact potential.
You really think a guy who maybe throws 60 innings a year has more impact than a #3 starter? Really?
Edtrack,
“The lower end of the first round is totally subjective. It’s like asking you to go into a sixth grade classroom and picking out who you’re gonna hire, when they graduate from High School.”
No, actually, that analogy is terrible. Teams have to be able to evaluate and develop talent. Its not a crap shoot. Some teams are good at it. Some aren’t.
“So, this idea that there’s a clear cut choice once you get past the first ten or so picks, is incorrect.”
Nobody is arguing this. Nobody is saying the M’s had to take one particular guy.
However, there are bad picks. The M’s, who are the worst team in baseball, taking a reliever is a bad pick.
There are a lot of guys who the M’s could have taken who would have been better picks. Tim Melville. Christian Friedrich. Casey Kelley. Gerrit Cole. Any of these guys would have been a better pick.
“Personally, I’d rather have an impact player at any position, than filler material.”
Are you seriously arguing that all the above named guys, plus several more that I didn’t mention, are “filler material?”
“You can buy those kind of guys, you don’t waste a first round draft pick on him.”
This quote really illustrates that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. The easiest type of player to get cheaply and/or with late round picks are relievers. Want a good example: the entire M’s bullpen besides Morrow. Putz, Lowe, and O´Flaherty were all late round pick. Dickey was a Rule 5 pick, and essentially free. Rhodes cost us a spring invite and a league minimum contract. Green was acquired in a trade for a guy who we were going to release. Rowland-Smith was returned to us after being picked in the Rule 5 draft.
The only part of the M’s team that is not terrible is the bullpen. We got all these guys for essentially nothing. The only guy who cost a high draft pick is the one guy who should not be used as a reliever.
As someone who presumably watches the M’s on occasion, I don’t know how you can be so totally ignorant of how easy it is to build a good pen.
Now, for the other side of the coin, look at how much payroll the M’s are spending on the middle and back of their rotation.
Come on, man. You can’t really be this dumb.
Morrow is the only 1st round pick in the pen. Same as last year.
Bavasi can put together a pen without using high draft picks.
The pick was Stooopid.
Jerry,
Because they are in last place today, doesn’t mean they will be at this time next year. And you DO NOT let that influence your choice in players, because teams can change dramatically from year to year, and this year’s need, may not be next year’s need.
Ummmmmmmmmm…..I do believe Max Scherzer is in the pen for the D-backs. Yet, another myth cut short.
Scherser is only in the pen for this year. By next season he wil be a starter again, and if I recall right he was brought up to be a starter while they had SP’s out. I have Scherzer on my NL fantasy team I minor league drafted the guy.
Fields is no Scherzer, he is a college unknown and could fall or trip in the shower pull something and be gone before he takes the mound.
But if the m’s scouting department is so unclear about a direction to take. With Bavasi at the helm or not there is a clear lakc of knowing talent here….I may not be able to lok at a pitcher and judge every pitch and say who will pan out. But I have learned to read the right people and compair there notes with others and come up with a decent judgement based off of that. and from what I have heard on KJR, XM Home PLate and ESPN and everywhere else the M’s have had there worst draft in recent memory and could have the worst this year by any team.
If they had drafted Scherzer I would be jumping for joy the kid can pitch…This kid, from what I am hearing was the teams best option to be a closer NOT the ideal optoin, And his bat was almost as good as a DH has some good pop. Maybe if all else fails he will be our Rick Ankiel…..God I hate the m’s right now…….
I want Langston back……
I wasn’t talking about the D-backs or any other team - only the Mariners. Hence the sentence: “Bavasi can put together a pen without using high draft picks.”
Try to keep up.
How can anyone justify buying a number three starter after paying one $48M for just 4 years in the offseason?
Friedrich as a number 3, would cost about $1.5M in bonuses and about $18M in salary for his first 6 years and about $70K for each minor league season.
Friedrich as a number 4 would cost the exact same thing. Our number 4 starter costs $36M for just 4 years.
Friedrich as a number 5 would cost the exact same thing. Our number 5 starter costs $27M for just 3 years.
Doesn’t anyone in the front office understand the hilarious disparity between figures here?
Sorry Adam, I misunderstood your post. Regardless, who gives a rip if he’s the ONLY #1 draft pick in Seattle’s, or any bullpen? It’s about results, not where you are drafted.
You name me a single guy in the pen who could have shutdown the Red Sox the way Morrow did a few days ago. So, it’s not just about throwing retreads out into the pen.
You name me a single guy in the pen who could have shutdown the Red Sox the way Morrow did a few days ago. So, it’s not just about throwing retreads out into the pen.
Putz can, when he’s right. We’ve seen it before.
Morrow should be a starter. He has the talent to start, and he was supposedly drafted to start. The fact that he’s dominating out of the pen doesn’t justify the Fields pick, especially since the Mariners are failing to properly utilize Morrow.
And again, you are missing the point. The fact that this bullpen is largely made up of non-first rounders, yet is a good pen (and was even better last year, with former indy-leaguer George Sherrill) only proves that there really is no need for a team with so many holes to be drafting for the bullpen.
Because whether you like it or not, a #3 starter or a corner bat or an athletic OF do have more impact than a short reliever.
Putz isn’t the EIGHTH inning guy….so he doesn’t count.
And, if you believe Morrow should be a starter, then you should be elated by this pick. It will give the M’s more opportunity to replace Morrow in the pen.
You freakin’ affixed on WHERE someone is drafted, rather than their value in a role. If their draft status was unknown, would you care? Drafting just puts you in the organization, it doesn’t mean you have to fulfill certain requirements.
adam RE 47: ya sure, they do have more value than a reliever. What corner bat would you have taken at 20? Ya sure they could have gone with fiedurch (sp?), and waited a couple of years for him to hopefully be a #3 starter, but there are NO guarantees. That guy could very well be a bust, which is why 24 other teams passed on him.
Your thinking that this guy would be a #3 starter, or that you would automatically get an impact bat at 20 is just ridiculous. you never know who will pan out, and when you get almost a sure thing and future closer, why is it so bad?
Guys, Fields isn’t quite a sure thing either.
We’re talking about a guy with 2 pitches, one that’s straight as an arrow, AND he comes with a history of command problems.
It’s easy to say he’ll move quickly because he’s a college reliever, but he’s definitely no sure thing to produce. That’s true for all draft players, which is why you go with the guy that can give you the most for his talent.
Fields isn’t going to have extended problems with the “straight” fastball, since he got the highest swing-and-miss percentage on his heater of any pitcher in division I baseball this year… and remember, those are light aluminum bats.
He’ll be fine.
49 - Name how many closers right now that were 1st round draft picks and at the same time were drafted as as a reliever?
Actually name how many current set-up that were also drafted in the first round as a reliever?
I can only think of Huston Street and he was a supplemental first at pick 40 and…that’s about it. Kerry Wood was drafted as a started, so was Joe Nathan. Lidge was a starter almost all of his minor league career and so was Wagner.
I just don’t understand this “sure thing” and “future closer” crap in defending the pick. I mean Fields the pitcher I have no problem with, but Fields the first round pick for a non-contending team with the worst record in baseball and a suspect 2009 campaign doesn’t make sense unless they plan on moving arms like Green, Lowe, and Putz to try and fill holes. Which should make anyone worried cause Bavasi making moves usually results in utter failure, and I mean trade moves.
If the M’s pick was makes so much sense, then how come the other 29 MLB teams closers are all non-first round relievers?
For every Huston Street or Chad Cordero there is a Ryan Wagner and Craig Hansen.
Man I gotta admit, I forgot about Chad Cordero…I guess we as M’s fans can only hope that the impact arm Cordero was for the Nationals will be the same for Fields and the M’s, right?
RE 52: who cares where they were taken? You are puttin SO much emphasis on where the player was taken, instead of what kind of talent the player actually is…
Jason,
Do you know anything about Luke Burnett? The M’s took him in one of the late rounds but early projections (not recent) had him as a possible first rounder and then he fell off the map. I saw his scouting video and it looks like his stuff (at least his fastball) is pretty good. Any ideas on why he would have been taken so late?
Adam, it’s BEYOND lame to bring up first round failures, as some sort of justification. There are numerous failure at EVERY position, both on the field, and in the draft.
Why do you bother? You hate everything about the Mariners, and I wonder if you even have a love for baseball. How sad a life.
I don’t know much about Bennett, no. Low-risk, medium-reward.
But his breaking ball is in stage one at an age where it should be one step from being a finished product.
baseballman,
where the player was taken does matter if there was a better talent available when they took said player.
Jason any chance you could give a little overview of some of the second day draft guys? Tenbrink looks like he has some potential, from what I’ve read he has above average tools, but has yet to put things together. Royster seems interesting, as does Kasparek, and after watching Stanford this weekend Molina looks ok.
Also is there any chance they sign Walker Kelly. I know he’s a Boras guy though.
Jason -
Who is this Ryan Royster kid? He looks like hes got nice skills and alot of speed. Whats his future look like and will he sign?